Wednesday 27 February 2019

PAF gets thrashed in their 1st incursion into India aerospace.

PAF gets thrashed in their 1st incursion into India aerospace. 

The brave Indian Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman shot down the 2 seater F16 in his single seater old Mig21. How the Mig21 downed the F-16-





Picture of a portion of the downed Pakistani Air Force F16 from yesterday’s failed PAF raid, wreckage was in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. Also seen in pic, Commanding Officer of Pakistan’s 7 Northern Light Infantry. Same picture circulating on social media claims that this is an Indian MiG fighter, however multiple IAF sources confirm this is the wreckage of Pakistani F16 downed yesterday.





Pakistan Military quickly removes wreckage of F16


Indian pilot fired into air before being captured

MUZAFFARABAD: Mohammad Razzaq Chaudhry was in the courtyard of his house in Horra’n village, located barely 7km from the Line of Control (LoC) in Azad Jammu and Kashmir’s Bhimber district, at about 8:45am on Wednesday when the “smoke and sound” made him realise that a dogfight was going on up above in the sky.

Upon watching them carefully, the 58-year-old political and social activist of the area noticed that two aircraft had caught fire but while one of them sped across the LoC, the other burst into flames and came down speedily.

Its wreckage fell more than one kilometre away from the house of Mr Razzaq towards the eastern side in a deserted field.

Mr Razzaq said he saw a parachute descending towards the ground, which made landing around one kilometre away from his house but on the southern side.

He jumped into a small pond where he tried to swallow some documents and maps

“A pilot emerged out of the parachute safe and sound,” he told Dawn from Horra’n village by telephone.

Mr Razzaq said he had in the meantime made calls to several youngsters in the village, asking them not to go close to the wreckage until arrival of the army personnel but get hold of the pilot.

The pilot, who was equipped with a pistol, asked the youngsters whether it was India or Pakistan. On this, one of them intelligently responded that it was India. The pilot, later identified as Wing Commander Abhi Nandan, shouted some slogans and asked which place exactly it was in India.

To this, the same boy responded that it was Qilla’n.

The pilot told them that his “back was broken” and he needed water to drink.

Some emotional youth, who could not digest the slogans, shouted Pakistan army zindabad. On this, Abhinandan shot a fire in the air while the boys picked up stones in their hands.

According to Mr Razzaq, the Indian pilot ran a distance of half a kilometre in backward direction while pointing his pistol towards the boys who were chasing him.

During this brisk movement, he fired some more gunshots in the air to frighten them but to no avail, he said. Then he jumped into a small pond where he took out some documents and maps from his pockets, some of which he tried to swallow and soaked others in water.

The boys kept on asking him to drop his weapon and in the meanwhile one boy shot at his leg, Mr Razzaq said.

Finally, he came out and said he should not be killed. The boys got hold of him from both arms. Some of them roughed him up, in a fit of rage, while others kept on stopping them.

In the meanwhile, army personnel arrived there and took him into their custody and saved him from the wrath of the youths, he said.

“Thanks God, none of the furious boys shot him dead because he had given them quite a tough time,” he said.

The detained pilot was then taken to an army installation in Bhimber in a convoy of military vehicles.

As the convoy passed through Khalil Chowk of Bhimber city, some 50km away from Horra’n, it was greeted by dozens of cheerful citizens standing on both sides of the road. They showered rose petals on the military vehicles, amid slogans like Long Live Pakistan army, Long Live Pakistan Air Force, Long Live Pakistan and Long Live Kashmir.

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2019

Veteran Air Marshal and father of Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, thanked people for their concern and wishes.

"I thank God for his blessings. Abhi is alive, not injured, sound in mind. Just look at the way he talked so bravely. A true soldier. We are so proud of him. I am sure all your hands and blessings are on his head; prayers for his safe return. I pray that he does not get tortured, and comes home safe and sound in body and mind. Thank you all for being with us in this hour of need. We draw our strengths from your support and energy." 

Varthaman Senior, who last served as Eastern Air Command chief, had even seen action during Kargil. An experienced test pilot with more than 4,000 flying hours on 40 types of aircraft to his credit, Varthaman senior had joined the IAF as a fighter pilot in 1973. "During the Kargil conflict, Varthaman was the chief operations officer of Gwalior where he used his flight test experience to coordinate the upgradation of the Mirage 2000 aircraft that proved instrumental in the success of the air campaign."


FRI, MAR 01, 2019
European Foundation for South Asian Studies
In response to Pak-backed terrorism, India has definitively changed the rules of the game: EFSAS

Amsterdam [The Netherlands], Mar 1 (ANI): With India carrying out a daring aerial strike operation at a large Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) camp deep inside Pakistan on Tuesday, New Delhi has finally discarded its policy of strategic restraint and unveiled a new security doctrine in which Pakistan can no longer export terror to India without paying a heavy price for it, according to a European think-tank.

In its commentary, the European Foundation for South Asian Studies (EFSAS), a non-profit think tank, based in Amsterdam, chronicles the events leading to the airstrikes by India and the subsequent foiled military action by Pakistan across the Line of Control (LoC).

The air raids were in response to the Pulwama terror attack on February 14, in which around 40 CRPF personnel lost their lives after a suicide bomber rammed his explosive-laden vehicle into their convoy. The deadly assault, orchestrated by Pakistan-based JeM, was the deadliest one on security forces in Kashmir.

The strikes destroyed a major camp of JeM and eliminating a “large number” of terrorists, including top commanders.

In the swift operation, launched at around 3.30 am and completed within minutes, 12 Mirage-2000 fighter jets pounded the training centre, housing around 300 terrorists, in Balakot area of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province with six bombs while SU-30 combat aircraft maintained air superiority to ward off any retaliation by the Pakistan Air Force.

The camp, located in a forest area atop a hill, was headed by JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother-in-law Yusuf Azhar alias Ustad Gauri, who was involved in the 1999 hijack of Indian Airlines plane IC-814 and was on Interpol lookout notice since 2000.

After the Indian Air Force (IAF) successfully completed their operation, a "startled, dazed and embarrassed Pakistan, after initially denying that any such incident had occurred, subsequently reluctantly acknowledged that Indian fighter aircrafts had indeed penetrated deep into Pakistani territory undetected and had dropped bombs near Balakot."

The Pakistani government, led by Prime Minister Imran Khan, had condemned on what it called "uncalled Indian aggression" and said that a befitting response would be given "at the time and place of its choosing", warning of military action against New Delhi, while calling for de-escalating of tensions and resuming of bilateral dialogue.

After the IAF jets were on its way back to India following their successful foray 80 km into Pakistani territory, India's Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale said the “pre-emptive” strike by India had become absolutely necessary as there was credible information that JeM, which recently carried out the terror attack in Pulwama, was planning further attacks in the country.

He underlined that despite repeated requests by India, “Pakistan has taken no concrete actions to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism on its soil”, which, he contended, “could not have functioned without the knowledge of Pakistan authorities”.

Referring to the Pulwama attack, Gokhale asserted that “credible intelligence was received that JeM was attempting another suicide terror attack in various parts of the country, and the fidayeen jihadis were being trained for this purpose," adding that “the selection of the target was also conditioned by our desire to avoid civilian casualties”.

These carefully chosen words conveyed that what India had undertaken was essentially a counter-terrorist operation aimed at neutralising terrorist attacks against India that specific intelligence had indicated was imminent, the commentary said.

"It was not directed against the Pakistani State or the Pakistani Army but at terrorists, and great care had been taken to avoid civilian casualties. The core message to Pakistan was that India was willing and capable of acting against anti-India terrorist groups being harboured by Pakistan, and while it was not inclined to provoke Pakistan militarily, it was now seriously intent on protecting itself no matter what the potential response from Pakistan would be," it added.

On Wednesday, Pakistan violated the Indian airspace and its botched attempt at retaliation through an airstrike targeting Indian military installations was repulsed by the IAF near the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir.

While the IAF shot down a Pakistani F-16 fighter, it also lost one of its MIG-21 fighters, who ejected before the impact, drifted across the LoC and was taken into custody by the Pakistan Army.

On the very next day, Imran Khan announced in the Pakistani Parliament that the IAF pilot, Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman, would be released as a "peace gesture". However, the cricketer-turned-premier did not make a commitment on clamping down "terrorist proxies of the Pakistani military establishment demonstrably".

"Anything short of that is not likely to appease the infuriated Indian government. The situation between the two countries, therefore, remains highly tense and volatile," the commentary outlined.

While India made it clear that there would be a military response in the aftermath of the Pulwama attack, the only mystery was over the form that it would take. New Delhi had described Islamabad's foiled air attack as an "act of aggression".

"It has also made it clear that only immediate and verifiable action by Pakistan against terrorists and terror groups operating from territories under its control was acceptable to it, not talks on terror as Imran Khan has suggested as a ruse to secure de-escalation without any significant concessions," it said.

Amidst calls for de-escalation of tensions, the international community rallied behind India, backing its counter-terrorism action and urging Pakistan to take strong and effective action to combat terror outfits operating in Pakistani soil.

The P3 nations -- the US, the UK and France, meanwhile, once again asked the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) sanctions committee to list JeM chief Masood Azhar as a global terrorist, thereby leading to an arms embargo, global travel ban and asset freeze.

“India has been a perpetual prisoner of its own self-restraint. I think Indians are now simply tired of being the punching bag for Pakistani terrorism. What they decided to do was send a signal that conspicuous attacks would not go unanswered (and that) Pakistani territory would not remain immune from Indian retaliation”, said Ashley Tellis, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Echoing similar sentiments, Alyssa Ayres, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, put forth, “There’s real exhaustion and fatigue with Pakistan in India, the same fatigue that is felt by nations around the world. There’s been a real hardening on whether talks can provide any benefits and whether Pakistan is genuine in its calls for dialogue”.

India's air strikes led to serious questions in Pakistan over its forces failing to even detect the IAF jets entering into its territory. Furthermore, the country's defence minister Pervez Khatak contention that the military was ready to repel the Indian attack, but "it was dark" invited further scepticism, the commentary continued.

This also includes foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi's vague statement that “the defenders of the nation are awake, and the nation has nothing to worry about”.

"The vacillating statements on whether or not and exactly where the strike took place, and with what impact, which were intermittently emanating from the spokesman of the Pakistan Army, did not help matters. The fact that India chose a target deep in the Pakistani heartland and not on contiguous Pakistan-occupied Kashmir that India claims as legally belonging to it amped up the jitters felt in Pakistan," the commentary further said.

Not only this, India’s External Affairs Minister, Sushma Swaraj, was invited to attend the 46th session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Abu Dhabi from March 1-2, in a significant first. This move was criticised by Pakistan, which said that it would attend the conclave if Swaraj participated in it. Subsequently, Islamabad boycotted the meeting of the 57-member organisation.

"Whichever turn the current situation takes, one fact on which there is little ambiguity is that India has definitively changed the rules of the game as far as its response to Pakistan-backed terrorism is concerned. Pakistan’s calculation that a low-cost asymmetrical war fought by terrorist proxies would keep India tied down and its assumption that the threat of nuclear war will inhibit India from retaliating in a conventional manner can now be consigned to history," the commentary further stated.

"It is Pakistan which will now have to decide whether it has the appetite or resources to stand up to the escalation that future terrorist attacks on India will invariably invite," the commentary concluded.


Some general analysis

1. Pakistan sent 24 jets: 8 F16, 4 Mirage3, 4 JF-17 + 8 escorts
2. Intercepted by 8 Indian jets: 4 Sukhoi 30, 2 Mirage 2000 & 2 MiG21 Bisons
3. One F16 jet shot by Indian jet and one MiG21 shot by Pak anti-aircraft gun

(F16wreckage proof) https://t.co/cM0vbWZg9Y

Baba je on Pakistan side explaining how 3 pilots fell from parachute. 1 Indian (MiG21) and two Pakistani (F16) https://t.co/nSCnF8phzM

Conclusion:
-Formation of 24 Pak jets couldn't bomb one military installation.
-24 Pak jet scooted & couldn't fight 8 Indian jet.
-Pak jet shot by Ind jet
-Ind jet shot by anti-aircraft gun
-Ind pilot ejected on Indian side but taken by wind
-2 Pak pilot eject fall on Pak side

The modest tone of Ghafoora and PM Niazi cry for peace only confirms, world no1 fauj shat bricks and now desperately pray that India doesn't retaliate. I doubt. Wishing is not reality. India will retaliate.

In its eagerness to claim victory on Twitter ispr released pics claiming two Indian plane down and shared all pics, later realising one was theirs and so back tracked to 1 indian down. Airframe of f16 https://t.co/jDhDoyagZD

MiG 21 debris were kept open for jurno tours until late evening, f16 debris were shuttled off hurriedly.


On the Indian side, debris of exhausted AMRAAM missile of f16 found. But Ghafoora lied to nation claiming no f16 deployed. Loser prick. https://t.co/prjKVG7pn0

This was posted by Dawn. ISPR got it censored. If ISPR can disown the son of an Air Marshal, imagine about footsoldiers. 

The details of PAF pilot of the F 16. The pilot who was killed by Wg Cdr Abhinandan has been now identified by PAF as Wg Cdr Shahzaz Ud Din of No 19 Squadron (Sherdils) flying F-16 A/B. He was the son of Air Marshal Waseem Ud Din, Deputy Chief of Air Staff (Operations) .

Air Marshal Waseem Ud Din is currently retired. He served as the DCAS (Ops) a while ago. The incumbent is Air Marshal Paracha. Commissioned in 77 just a few years after Air Marshal Varthaman. 

Thread Link - https://twitter.com/GernailSaheb/status/1101153923317096449

Tuesday 26 February 2019

How did the Indian fighter aircraft Mirage attack Pakistan's Balakot

How did the Indian fighter aircraft Mirage attack Pakistan's Balakot

BBC Hindi, New Delhi Updated Tue, 26 Feb 2019 06:38 PM
How did Indian fighter aircraft
On the morning of February 26, people were sleepy, Pakistani spokesman Asif Gafoor tweeted, informing that the fighter aircraft of India had entered the Muzaffarabad sector within the control of three to four kilometers across the Line of Control. Gafoor also said that after immediate response to Pakistan, India had to retreat and there was no harm.

After this, India said that the Indian Air Force in Balakot, Pakistan, has demolished the hideouts of extremist organizations. This time Pakistan has acknowledged that India's fighter aircraft had come while the last time Pakistan had rejected India's claim of surgical strike. Now, the questions are being raised that Indian fighter planes enter Pakistan and come out after the attack; Pakistan on the other hand does not do anything.

Even Pakistanis are asking their army questions why their army did not kill these Indian planes? Pakistani citizen Fawad Javed has asked the Pakistani Army questions how the Indian aircraft cross the border? Javed tweeted, they entered our airspace and our army did not kill them. Now you are only firing on Twitter Does Pakistan not know from its Air Force surveillance system that the Indian aircrafts have entered its borders? After all, why can not Pakistan take any action?

Laxman Kumar Bahera, director of The Institute for Defense Studies and Analysis, says that Pakistan's Air Force is very weak compared to the Indian Air Force. Bahera says that Pakistan's Air Force is not capable of responding to such attacks. The preparations of the Indian Air Force were so precise that it was not easy for Pakistan to make an estimate. India has carried out this attack in a very short time. Pakistan's air surveillance system and jammer are very lax. Handling the attack of such a short time is not the case with Pakistan's current air surveillance bus.

Media reports of India are being claimed that 12 Mirage fighter aircraft of India had crossed the border and returned within 21 minutes by executing the assault. It is being said that in the last five decades, after the 1971 war, India has for the first time crossed the border. In April 2000, Indian Air Force bought two A-50 AWAC (Airborne Warning and Control) aircraft from Russia. This was very important for radar systems and electronic surveillance. 

When India had bought it, then retired Air Marshal Ayaz Ahmed Khan of Pakistan had described it as dangerous for Pakistan. Ayaz Khan had said that India has been able to spy this system within Pakistan and spy the Pakistani airspace. Ayaz Khan had warned that the Indian Air Force would know the activities of the Pakistani Air Force base from this system beforehand.

Khan had said that from the A-50 AWAC, India will already know where the Pakistani radar system is located, where the deployment of the missile is and what activities the Pakistani Air Force is doing. The A-50 AWAC made in Russia is capable of detecting all the activities of Pakistan's Air Force and is worrisome for Pakistan.

A report of Defense.PK, a website reporting on defense related issues in Pakistan, says that the Airborne Radars of Pakistan have gone old. According to this report, India has spent a lot on its airborne surveillance. Although Pakistan has also tried to upgrade Khud but India is a very large country, there is so much to do for Pakistan's surveillance system. Ayaz Khan's report has said that after the arrival of Airborne Warning and Control from Russia to India, the Pakistani Air Force's defense system has gone a lot behind.

America is at the forefront of the technology that deals with airborne warning and control technology. Pakistan is now reliant on China in defense matters. But in case of air surveillance, Pakistan has not received much help from China. Defense help and defense technology that has been given to Pakistan by the United States has been completely stopped. 

Within a few months of the end of the Obama administration, the US Congress banned F-16 fighter aircraft from selling it to Pakistan. After this, the F-16 Fighter jets started with the attention of developing JF-17 fighter jets in collaboration with China. The US Congress took a tough stand against Pakistan on F-16, then Pakistan started looking for military equipment in another partner.

According to the report of the International Peace Research Institute, the arms deal between USA and Pakistan has slipped from $ 1 billion to $ 2.1 million last year. However, between China and Pakistan, the size of arms deals declined but its speed is slow. Pakistan's arms deal with China reached $ 74.4 million to $ 51.4 million. Simultaneously, China was ranked number one in terms of arms sales to Pakistan. 

According to the American Defense Website Global Fire Power, Pakistan has 1281 aircraft, while India has 2185. Laxman Kumar Behra also believes that Pakistan is a nuclear power country but in many cases it is very weak compared to India. According to the news agency PTI, BSF will be able to achieve surveillance capacity of 2000 km on the border with Pakistan and Bangladesh soon.

https://www.amarujala.com/india-news/how-did-indian-fighter-aircraft-mirage-attack-pakistan-balakot